TY - JOUR
T1 - Adaptive capacity in the multi-level management system of migratory waterbirds
T2 - a case study of participatory goose management in Sweden
AU - Eriksson, Louise
AU - Johansson, Maria
AU - Månsson, Johan
AU - Sandström, Camilla
AU - Elmberg, Johan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2022/10/17
Y1 - 2022/10/17
N2 - Adaptive management (AM) is one approach to manage migratory waterbirds, but obstacles to the implementation of AM require adaptive capacities in the management system (rules, institutions, action situations). This study aims to examine the adaptive capacity of participatory goose management in Sweden. Considering the biophysical and institutional context, we analyzed how tangible, individual, and governance assets were associated with technical and social learning. Interviews with informants in the national council for geese, swans, and cranes, and local management groups (LMGs) were conducted, and documentation reviewed. Results revealed evidence of a local preparedness in areas with an LMG. Nevertheless, the study highlighted a need to formalize the evolving system, to consider a more systematic implementation of AM (including regulations allowing for adaptive responses), and to ensure stakeholder acceptance for management tools and visions. The study illustrates the need for a broad set of assets to ensure learning in participatory management.
AB - Adaptive management (AM) is one approach to manage migratory waterbirds, but obstacles to the implementation of AM require adaptive capacities in the management system (rules, institutions, action situations). This study aims to examine the adaptive capacity of participatory goose management in Sweden. Considering the biophysical and institutional context, we analyzed how tangible, individual, and governance assets were associated with technical and social learning. Interviews with informants in the national council for geese, swans, and cranes, and local management groups (LMGs) were conducted, and documentation reviewed. Results revealed evidence of a local preparedness in areas with an LMG. Nevertheless, the study highlighted a need to formalize the evolving system, to consider a more systematic implementation of AM (including regulations allowing for adaptive responses), and to ensure stakeholder acceptance for management tools and visions. The study illustrates the need for a broad set of assets to ensure learning in participatory management.
KW - geese
KW - multi-level management
KW - social learning
KW - technical learning
KW - wildlife
U2 - 10.1080/09640568.2022.2124153
DO - 10.1080/09640568.2022.2124153
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85140000257
SN - 0964-0568
VL - 67
SP - 522
EP - 541
JO - Journal of Environmental Planning and Management
JF - Journal of Environmental Planning and Management
IS - 3
ER -