In-group ratings are affected by who asks and how: interactive effects of experimenter group-membership and response format

Fredrik Björklund, Martin Bäckstrom, Øyvind Jørgensen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In three experiments, participants rated how well a number of adjectives described their in-group (e.g. kind-hearted, helpful, intelligent, efficient, etc.). In Experiment 1, females were found to rate their ingroup (females) more favorably when reporting verbally to female (rather than male) experimenters. This finding was further explored in two subsequent experiments where response format (written vs. verbal) was also manipulated. Both experiments revealed an interaction such that ethnic Swedes rated their in-group (Swedes) the most favorably when reporting verbally to an in-group experimenter and the least favorably when reporting verbally to a Middle Eastern experimenter. Results are discussed in relation to correction and contextual activation of social norms.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)625-34
Number of pages591
JournalJournal of Social Psychology
Volume151
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Swedish Standard Keywords

  • Psychology (501)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'In-group ratings are affected by who asks and how: interactive effects of experimenter group-membership and response format'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this