Machinery-related perceived risks and safety attitudes in senior Swedish farmers

Federica Caffaro, Peter Lundqvist, Margherita Micheletti Cremasco, Kerstin Nilsson, Stefan Pinzke, Eugenio Cavallo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To perform an ergonomic analysis of work and machinery-related risks in a group of Swedish older farmers, investigating farmers’ attitudes and perceptions about: 1) health status and work motivation, 2) physical and cognitive workload and difficulties in the interaction with machinery and technological innovations, and 3) risks and safety practices. Methods: Nine
Swedish male farmers aged 65+ were administered a semi-structured interview and a questionnaire. Results: Participants perceived themselves as being in good health and considered farming as a good proxy of their health status. They reported an increased physical workload but did not describe any cognitive workload. Technology was reported to have low usability, and thus its
benefits cannot be fully exploited. Older farmers acknowledged the existence of “new risks” related to the aging process and mainly referred to the common sense and previous experience as the best safety practices. Conclusion: Multilevel interventions focused on the capabilities and limits of the older farmers should be developed, involving both training activities and design
solutions for the machinery that can support older farmers’ health and safety.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)78-91
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Agromedicine
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018
Externally publishedYes

Swedish Standard Keywords

  • Occupational Health and Environmental Health (30303)

Keywords

  • Aging farmer
  • agricultural machinery safety
  • ergonomics
  • mixed method research
  • technology acceptance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Machinery-related perceived risks and safety attitudes in senior Swedish farmers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this