Revisorsrotationens effekter

: utifrån revisorers byråtillhörighet och professionella karriär

Abstract

Mandatory audit rotation aims to improve auditor’s independence however previous research has shown that the regulation can cause both advantages and disadvantages on the audit profession. Researchers are therefore in a disagreement over whether or not the effects caused by the regulation are considered to be favourable or damaging to auditors.

The purpose of this study is to explain mandatory audit rotation based on audit firm affiliation and auditors’ professional careers. A considerable amount of previous literature and research papers have been examined in order to reach the purpose of this study. Eight hypotheses have been defined based on earlier research within the subject. The hypotheses deal with the three main effects caused by the regulation, namely effects related to economics, public assurance and quality. A survey was used to test the study’s hypotheses and the selected respondents were auditors in Sweden.  

The results of the study show that more experienced auditors have a more negative view on the regulations effects related to public assurance. The study also confirms that auditors general view is that the regulation is necessary and important. On the other hand, the study could not prove that auditors within different firm affiliations have different views on the regulation.

This study contributes to an increased understanding of how mandatory audit rotation effects auditors and their clients. By increasing the audit professions understanding and knowledge about the regulation audit firms can focus on taking action to handle the effects in a more efficient way.