TY - JOUR
T1 - Does exercise intensity matter for fatigue during (neo-)adjuvant cancer treatment? The Phys-Can randomized clinical trial
AU - Demmelmaier, Ingrid
AU - Brooke, Hannah L
AU - Henriksson, Anna
AU - Mazzoni, Anne-Sophie
AU - Bjørke, Ann Christin Helgesen
AU - Igelström, Helena
AU - Ax, Anna-Karin
AU - Sjövall, Katarina
AU - Hellbom, Maria
AU - Pingel, Ronnie
AU - Lindman, Henrik
AU - Johansson, Silvia
AU - Velikova, Galina
AU - Raastad, Truls
AU - Buffart, Laurien M
AU - Åsenlöf, Pernilla
AU - Aaronson, Neil K
AU - Glimelius, Bengt
AU - Nygren, Peter
AU - Johansson, Birgitta
AU - Börjeson, Sussanne
AU - Berntsen, Sveinung
AU - Nordin, Karin
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by The Swedish Cancer Society (grant numbers 150841, 160483); The Swedish Research Council (grant number KDB/9514); The Nordic Cancer Union (2015), and The Oncology Department Foundations Research Fund in Uppsala (2016, 2017). The authors would like to acknowledge the study participants, the clinicians involved in recruitment, the staff at the public gyms where the resistance exercise was performed, and the patient representatives who contributed with their perspectives. We also acknowledge Dr Pernille H?jman, Centre for Physical Activity Research and Centre of Inflammation and Metabolism, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen, Denmark, who contributed substantially to the project but sadly passed away in April 2019.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science In Sports published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Exercise during cancer treatment improves cancer-related fatigue (CRF), but the importance of exercise intensity for CRF is unclear. We compared the effects of high- vs low-to-moderate-intensity exercise with or without additional behavior change support (BCS) on CRF in patients undergoing (neo-)adjuvant cancer treatment. This was a multicenter, 2x2 factorial design randomized controlled trial (Clinical Trials NCT02473003) in Sweden. Participants recently diagnosed with breast (n = 457), prostate (n = 97) or colorectal (n = 23) cancer undergoing (neo-)adjuvant treatment were randomized to high intensity (n = 144), low-to-moderate intensity (n = 144), high intensity with BCS (n = 144) or low-to-moderate intensity with BCS (n = 145). The 6-month exercise intervention included supervised resistance training and home-based endurance training. CRF was assessed by Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI, five subscales score range 4-20), and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue scale (FACIT-F, score range 0-52). Multiple linear regression for main factorial effects was performed according to intention-to-treat, with post-intervention CRF as primary endpoint. Overall, 577 participants (mean age 58.7 years) were randomized. Participants randomized to high- vs low-to-moderate-intensity exercise had lower physical fatigue (MFI Physical Fatigue subscale; mean difference -1.05 [95% CI: -1.85, -0.25]), but the difference was not clinically important (ie <2). We found no differences in other CRF dimensions and no effect of additional BCS. There were few minor adverse events. For CRF, patients undergoing (neo-)adjuvant treatment for breast, prostate or colorectal cancer can safely exercise at high- or low-to-moderate intensity, according to their own preferences. Additional BCS does not provide extra benefit for CRF in supervised, well-controlled exercise interventions.
AB - Exercise during cancer treatment improves cancer-related fatigue (CRF), but the importance of exercise intensity for CRF is unclear. We compared the effects of high- vs low-to-moderate-intensity exercise with or without additional behavior change support (BCS) on CRF in patients undergoing (neo-)adjuvant cancer treatment. This was a multicenter, 2x2 factorial design randomized controlled trial (Clinical Trials NCT02473003) in Sweden. Participants recently diagnosed with breast (n = 457), prostate (n = 97) or colorectal (n = 23) cancer undergoing (neo-)adjuvant treatment were randomized to high intensity (n = 144), low-to-moderate intensity (n = 144), high intensity with BCS (n = 144) or low-to-moderate intensity with BCS (n = 145). The 6-month exercise intervention included supervised resistance training and home-based endurance training. CRF was assessed by Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI, five subscales score range 4-20), and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue scale (FACIT-F, score range 0-52). Multiple linear regression for main factorial effects was performed according to intention-to-treat, with post-intervention CRF as primary endpoint. Overall, 577 participants (mean age 58.7 years) were randomized. Participants randomized to high- vs low-to-moderate-intensity exercise had lower physical fatigue (MFI Physical Fatigue subscale; mean difference -1.05 [95% CI: -1.85, -0.25]), but the difference was not clinically important (ie <2). We found no differences in other CRF dimensions and no effect of additional BCS. There were few minor adverse events. For CRF, patients undergoing (neo-)adjuvant treatment for breast, prostate or colorectal cancer can safely exercise at high- or low-to-moderate intensity, according to their own preferences. Additional BCS does not provide extra benefit for CRF in supervised, well-controlled exercise interventions.
KW - behavior change
KW - cancer-related fatigue
KW - endurance training
KW - oncology
KW - resistance training
U2 - 10.1111/sms.13930
DO - 10.1111/sms.13930
M3 - Article
SN - 0905-7188
VL - 31
SP - 1144
EP - 1159
JO - Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports
JF - Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports
IS - 5
ER -