Elitprojekt eller gräsrotsorganisering?: Lantbrukets organisationsformer och den samhällsekonomiska omvandlingen , Sverige ca 1800-1870

Magnus Bohman

Elitprojekt eller gräsrotsorganisering? Lantbrukets organisationsformer och den samhällsekonomiska omvandlingen , Sverige ca 1800-1870

Forskningsoutput: Konferensbidrag › Sammanfattning (abstract) › Peer review

Originalspråk	Svenska
Status	Publicerad - 2021-okt.-09
Externt publicerad	Ja
Evenemang	The 14th Swedish Economic History Meeting in collaboration with the 2nd Annual Conference of the Scandinavian Society for Economic and Social History - Göteborgs universitet, Göteborg, Sverige Varaktighet: 2021-okt.-07 → 2021-okt.-09 https://ekonomiskhistoria.org/programme

Konferens

Konferens	The 14th Swedish Economic History Meeting in collaboration with the 2nd Annual Conference of the Scandinavian Society for Economic and Social History
Land/Territorium	Sverige
Ort	Göteborg
Period	21-10-07 → 21-10-09
Internetadress	https://ekonomiskhistoria.org/programme

Nationell ämneskategori

Ekonomisk historia (50203)

Citera det här

@conference{8e6daddadfba4e3e9f83622ab6e7bc92,

title = "Elitprojekt eller gr{\"a}srotsorganisering?: Lantbrukets organisationsformer och den samh{\"a}llsekonomiska omvandlingen , Sverige ca 1800-1870",

author = "Magnus Bohman",

year = "2021",

month = oct,

day = "9",

language = "Svenska",

note = "The 14th Swedish Economic History Meeting in collaboration with the 2nd Annual Conference of the Scandinavian Society for Economic and Social History ; Conference date: 07-10-2021 Through 09-10-2021",

url = "https://ekonomiskhistoria.org/programme",

}

Elitprojekt eller gräsrotsorganisering? Lantbrukets organisationsformer och den samhällsekonomiska omvandlingen , Sverige ca 1800-1870. / Bohman, Magnus.
2021. Abstract från The 14th Swedish Economic History Meeting in collaboration with the 2nd Annual Conference of the Scandinavian Society for Economic and Social History, Göteborg, Sverige.

Forskningsoutput: Konferensbidrag › Sammanfattning (abstract) › Peer review