Home living older adults' subjective perceptions, evaluation, and interpretations of various welfare technology: A systematic review of qualitative studies

  • Z Pajalic
  • , Olsen SEG
  • , A Hamre
  • , Strøm BS
  • , C Clausen
  • , D Saplacan
  • , G Kulla

Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragArtikel, reviewPeer review

4 Citeringar (Scopus)

Sammanfattning

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

This paper aims to map home-living older adults' subjective perceptions, evaluations, and interpretations of various welfare technologies.

Systematic literature review.

The study was designed as a systematic literature review of qualitative studies. This systematic literature review was carried out according to the PRISMA statement and was prospectively registered in PROSPERO registration number CRD42020190206. The international electronic bibliographic databases included AMED, Academic, CINAHL, Cochrane Reviews, EMBASE, Google Scholar, MEDLINE via PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The scientific evidence was synthesized using qualitative analysis. All aspects of the study method followed COREQ guidelines.

Following a detailed systematic search and screening of 1405 studies, 10 were included in the systematic review. The study shows that implementing Welfare Technology seems to prolong older adults' independent living in their own homes and was perceived as a complement to face-to-face contact with health care providers.

This study indicated that older adults consider accepting Welfare Technology as it contributes to a sense of security and empowerment in their everyday lives.
OriginalspråkEngelska
Sidor (från-till)100470
Antal sidor1
TidskriftPublic Health in Practice
Volym7
DOI
StatusPublicerad - 2024-jan.-19
Externt publiceradJa

Fingeravtryck

Fördjupa i forskningsämnen för ”Home living older adults' subjective perceptions, evaluation, and interpretations of various welfare technology: A systematic review of qualitative studies”. Tillsammans bildar de ett unikt fingeravtryck.

Citera det här