Modeling test learning and dual-task dissociations

Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragArtikel

1 Nedladdningar (Pure)


Much of cognitive psychology is premised on the distinction between automatic and intentional processes, but the distinction often remains vague in practice and alternative explanations are often not followed through. For example, Hendricks, Conway and Kellogg (Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition39, 491–1500, 2013) found that dual tasks at training versus at test dissociated performance in two different artificial grammar learning tasks. This was taken as evidence for underlying automatic and intentional processes. In this article, a different explanation is considered based on test learning and similarity, where participants are assumed to update their knowledge at test. Contrasting formal memory models of test learning are implemented, and it is concluded that the models account for the relevant dissociations without assuming a distinction between automatic and intentional processes.

Sidor (från-till)1036-1042
Antal sidor6
TidskriftPsychonomic Bulletin & Review
StatusPublicerad - 2020

Nationell ämneskategori

  • Psykologi (50101)


Fördjupa i forskningsämnen för ”Modeling test learning and dual-task dissociations”. Tillsammans bildar de ett unikt fingeravtryck.

Citera det här