On the disciplinary affordances of semiotic resources

John Airey, Urban Eriksson, Tobias Fredlund, Cedric Linder

Forskningsoutput: KonferensbidragSammanfattning

Sammanfattning

In the late 70’s Gibson (1979) introduced the concept of affordance. Initially framed around the needs of an organism in its environment, over the years the term has been appropriated and debated at length by a number of researchers in various fields. Most famous, perhaps is the disagreement between Gibson and Norman (1988) about whether affordances are inherent properties of objects or are only present when they are perceived by an organism. More recently, affordance has been drawn on in the educational arena, particularly with respect to multimodality (see Linder (2013) for a recent example). Here, Kress et al. (2001) have claimed that different modes have different specialized affordances. Then, building on this idea, Airey and Linder (2009) suggested that there is a critical constellation of modes that students need to achieve fluency in before they can experience a concept in an appropriate disciplinary manner. Later, Airey (2009) nuanced this claim, shifting the focus from the modes themselves to a critical constellation of semiotic resources, thus acknowledging that different semiotic resources within a mode often have different affordances (e.g. two or more diagrams may form the critical constellation).

In this theoretical paper the concept of disciplinary affordance (Fredlund et al., 2012) is suggested as a useful analytical tool for use in education. The concept makes a radical break with the views of both Gibson and Norman in that rather than focusing on the discernment of one individual, it refers to the disciplinary community as a whole. Put simply, the disciplinary affordances of a given semiotic resource are determined by those functions that the resource is expected to fulfil by the disciplinary community. Disciplinary affordances have thus been negotiated and developed within the discipline over time. As such, the question of whether these affordances are inherent or discerned becomes moot. Rather, from an educational perspective the issue is whether the meaning that a semiotic resource affords to an individual matches the disciplinary affordance assigned by the community. The power of the term for educational work is that learning can now be framed as coming to discern the disciplinary affordances of semiotic resources.

In this paper we will briefly discuss the history of the term affordance, define the term disciplinary affordance and illustrate its usefulness in a number of educational settings.

OriginalspråkEngelska
Sidor54-55
Antal sidor1
StatusPublicerad - 2014
EvenemangThe first Conference of the International Association for Cognitive Semiotics, Lund, Sweden, 25-27 Sept 2014 -
Varaktighet: 1980-jan-01 → …

Konferens

KonferensThe first Conference of the International Association for Cognitive Semiotics, Lund, Sweden, 25-27 Sept 2014
Period80-01-01 → …

Nationell ämneskategori

  • Annan fysik (10399)
  • Didaktik (50302)
  • Jämförande språkvetenskap och allmän lingvistik (60201)

Fingeravtryck

Fördjupa i forskningsämnen för ”On the disciplinary affordances of semiotic resources”. Tillsammans bildar de ett unikt fingeravtryck.

Citera det här