Own-other differences in the realism of some metacognitive judgments

Marcus Johansson, Carl Martin Allwood

Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragArtikelPeer review

7 Citeringar (Scopus)

Sammanfattning

The present study investigated differences in judgments of one’s own and others’ knowledge (the own-other difference). Consistent with the below-average effect (e.g., Kruger, 1999), our main results showed that the participants gave lower knowledge ratings of their own extent of knowledge than of another person’s extent of knowledge (Experiment 1). Furthermore, lower and more realistic judgments were found when the participants judged their own as compared with when judging another person’s overall accuracy (frequency judgments) of answering knowledge questions correctly (Experiment 1 and 2). On the basis of these results it is argued that judgmental anchoring may be important also in the context of indirect comparisons, and that previous conclusions of cross-cultural psychology regarding the above-average effect may be oversimplified.

OriginalspråkEngelska
Sidor (från-till)13-21
Antal sidor8
TidskriftScandinavian Journal of Psychology
Volym48
Utgåva1
DOI
StatusPublicerad - 2007
Externt publiceradJa

Nationell ämneskategori

  • Tillämpad psykologi (50102)
  • Psykologi (50101)

Fingeravtryck

Fördjupa i forskningsämnen för ”Own-other differences in the realism of some metacognitive judgments”. Tillsammans bildar de ett unikt fingeravtryck.

Citera det här