TY - JOUR
T1 - The First Hybrid International Educational Comprehensive Cleft Care Workshop
AU - The First Hybrid International Educational Comprehensive Cleft Care Workshop
AU - Kantar, Rami S.
AU - Esenlik, Elçin
AU - Al Abyad, Omar S.
AU - Melhem, Antonio
AU - Younan, Robert A.
AU - Haddad, Mario
AU - Keith, Kristen
AU - Kassam, Serena
AU - Annan, Beyhan
AU - Vijayakumar, Charanya
AU - Picard, Arnaud
AU - Padwa, Bonnie L.
AU - Sommerlad, Brian
AU - Raposo-Amaral, Cassio Eduardo
AU - Forrest, Christopher R.
AU - Gillett, David A.
AU - Steinbacher, Derek M.
AU - Runyan, Christopher M.
AU - Tanikawa, Daniela Y.S.
AU - Chong, David K.
AU - Fisher, David M.
AU - Mark, Hans
AU - Canter, Halil Ibrahim
AU - Losee, Joseph E.
AU - Patel, Krishna G.
AU - Hartzell, Larry D.
AU - Johnson, Adam B.
AU - Collares, Marcus Vinícius Martins
AU - Alonso, Nivaldo
AU - Chen, Philip Kuo Ting
AU - Tse, Raymond
AU - Mann, Robert J.
AU - Prada-Madrid, Jose Rolando
AU - Kobayashi, Shinji
AU - Hussain, Syed Altaf
AU - Kummer, Ann
AU - Sell, Debbie A.
AU - Pereira, Valerie J.
AU - Mabry, Kelly
AU - Gonsoulin, Courtney K.
AU - Persson, Martin
AU - Davies, Gareth
AU - Sethna, Navil F.
AU - Munoz-Pareja, Jennifer C.
AU - Kuijpers-Jagtman, Anne Marie
AU - Grayson, Barry H.
AU - Grollemund, Bruno
AU - Garib, Daniela G.
AU - Meazzini, Maria Costanza
AU - Kharbanda, Om P.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.
PY - 2022/5/9
Y1 - 2022/5/9
N2 - Objective: Describe the first hybrid global simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshop, evaluate impact on participants, and compare experiences based on in-person versus virtual attendance. Design: Cross-sectional survey-based evaluation. Setting: International comprehensive cleft care workshop. Participants: Total of 489 participants. Interventions: Three-day simulation-based hybrid comprehensive cleft care workshop. Main Outcome Measures: Participant demographic data, perceived barriers and interventions needed for global comprehensive cleft care delivery, participant workshop satisfaction, and perceived short-term impact on practice stratified by in-person versus virtual attendance. Results: The workshop included 489 participants from 5 continents. The response rate was 39.9%. Participants perceived financial factors (30.3%) the most significant barrier and improvement in training (39.8%) as the most important intervention to overcome barriers facing cleft care delivery in low to middle-income countries. All participants reported a high level of satisfaction with the workshop and a strong positive perceived short-term impact on their practice. Importantly, while this was true for both in-person and virtual attendees, in-person attendees reported a significantly higher satisfaction with the workshop (28.63 ± 3.08 vs 27.63 ± 3.93; P =.04) and perceived impact on their clinical practice (22.37 ± 3.42 vs 21.02 ± 3.45 P =.01). Conclusion: Hybrid simulation-based educational comprehensive cleft care workshops are overall well received by participants and have a positive perceived impact on their clinical practices. In-person attendance is associated with significantly higher satisfaction and perceived impact on practice. Considering that financial and health constraints may limit live meeting attendance, future efforts will focus on making in-person and virtual attendance more comparable.
AB - Objective: Describe the first hybrid global simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshop, evaluate impact on participants, and compare experiences based on in-person versus virtual attendance. Design: Cross-sectional survey-based evaluation. Setting: International comprehensive cleft care workshop. Participants: Total of 489 participants. Interventions: Three-day simulation-based hybrid comprehensive cleft care workshop. Main Outcome Measures: Participant demographic data, perceived barriers and interventions needed for global comprehensive cleft care delivery, participant workshop satisfaction, and perceived short-term impact on practice stratified by in-person versus virtual attendance. Results: The workshop included 489 participants from 5 continents. The response rate was 39.9%. Participants perceived financial factors (30.3%) the most significant barrier and improvement in training (39.8%) as the most important intervention to overcome barriers facing cleft care delivery in low to middle-income countries. All participants reported a high level of satisfaction with the workshop and a strong positive perceived short-term impact on their practice. Importantly, while this was true for both in-person and virtual attendees, in-person attendees reported a significantly higher satisfaction with the workshop (28.63 ± 3.08 vs 27.63 ± 3.93; P =.04) and perceived impact on their clinical practice (22.37 ± 3.42 vs 21.02 ± 3.45 P =.01). Conclusion: Hybrid simulation-based educational comprehensive cleft care workshops are overall well received by participants and have a positive perceived impact on their clinical practices. In-person attendance is associated with significantly higher satisfaction and perceived impact on practice. Considering that financial and health constraints may limit live meeting attendance, future efforts will focus on making in-person and virtual attendance more comparable.
KW - craniofacial morphology
KW - dental health
KW - epidemiology
KW - ethics/health policies
KW - hard palate
KW - lip form
KW - lip function
KW - nonsyndromic clefting
KW - nursing
KW - nutrition
KW - oral health
KW - palatoplasty
KW - pediatrics
KW - soft palate
KW - surgical technique
U2 - 10.1177/10556656221097820
DO - 10.1177/10556656221097820
M3 - Article
C2 - 35532040
AN - SCOPUS:85130251687
SN - 1055-6656
JO - Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
JF - Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
ER -