TY - JOUR
T1 - Using rubrics for formative purposes
T2 - identifying factors that may affect the success of rubric implementations
AU - Jonsson, Anders
AU - Panadero, Ernesto
AU - Pinedo, Leire
AU - Fernández-Castilla, Belén
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2025/4/1
Y1 - 2025/4/1
N2 - The formative use of rubrics seems to have the potential of promoting student learning, supposedly by making expectations and criteria explicit. However, there is a variation in effects on how well students perform on academic tasks when supported by rubrics. The aim of this study was to identify factors in rubric interventions that may potentially explain this variation in effects. This was investigated by analysing 15 ‘high-quality studies’ reporting on rubric interventions. The ‘success’ of these studies was ranked, based on the effect size on academic performance from rubric interventions. We performed a content analysis, searching for similarities and differences in procedures and instrumentation. Our analysis revealed two key characteristics common to successful interventions: First, teachers explain both the content of the rubric and its application for formative purposes. Second, an effective sequence involves students writing or producing work, followed by feedback or self-assessment, and subsequent revision.
AB - The formative use of rubrics seems to have the potential of promoting student learning, supposedly by making expectations and criteria explicit. However, there is a variation in effects on how well students perform on academic tasks when supported by rubrics. The aim of this study was to identify factors in rubric interventions that may potentially explain this variation in effects. This was investigated by analysing 15 ‘high-quality studies’ reporting on rubric interventions. The ‘success’ of these studies was ranked, based on the effect size on academic performance from rubric interventions. We performed a content analysis, searching for similarities and differences in procedures and instrumentation. Our analysis revealed two key characteristics common to successful interventions: First, teachers explain both the content of the rubric and its application for formative purposes. Second, an effective sequence involves students writing or producing work, followed by feedback or self-assessment, and subsequent revision.
KW - Critical review
KW - instructional design
KW - rubrics
KW - student performance
KW - systematic review
U2 - 10.1080/0969594X.2025.2486947
DO - 10.1080/0969594X.2025.2486947
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105002061160
SN - 0969-594X
JO - Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice
JF - Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice
ER -